On Fri,  9 Feb 2018 20:59:13 +0100
Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

s/precise/precise about/

> Revision 1 of the CCW transport is currently defined as virtio 1.0. This
> could become confusing when we bump the version of the virtio
> specification to 1.1, in a sense that it could be interpreted like one
> can not use any features not part of the 1.0 specification.
> 
> So let us try to avoid confusion regarding the semantic of virtio-ccw
> revision 1.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  content.tex |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> index c7ef7fd..86044dd 100644
> --- a/content.tex
> +++ b/content.tex
> @@ -2572,7 +2572,7 @@ The following values are supported:
>  \hline \hline
>  0        & 0      & <empty>   & legacy interface; transitional devices only 
> \\
>  \hline
> -1        & 0      & <empty>   & Virtio 1.0 \\
> +1        & 0      & <empty>   & Virtio 1 \\
>  \hline
>  2        & 0      & <empty>   & CCW_CMD_READ_STATUS support \\
>  \hline

Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org

Reply via email to