On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 15:09:04 +0100 Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 09:01:08 -0500 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 01:24:32PM +0100, Jens Freimann wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:03:37PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > + If this feature bit is negotiated, the ordering in effect for any > > > > + memory accesses by the driver that need to be ordered in a specific > > > > way > > > > + with respect to accesses by the device is the one suitable for > > > > devices > > > > + described by the platform. > > > > > > I had to read this sentence several times. How about: "Some memory > > > accesses by the driver need to be ordered in a specific way with > > > respect to accesses by the device. If this feature bit is negotiated, > > > these accesses need to match the ordering requirements of devices as > > > described for the platform." > > > > > > In any case: > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Jens Freimann <jfreim...@redhat.com> > > > > I think we can make this change under the trivial changes rule, thanks! > > I agree, and I think that Jens' wording is easier to read. > I find both of these quite tricky. Yet I consider both versions are good enough. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
