Hi,

> +struct dma_buf *virtgpu_gem_prime_export(struct drm_gem_object *obj,
> +                                      int flags)
> +{
[ ... ]
> +}
> +
> +struct drm_gem_object *virtgpu_gem_prime_import(struct drm_device *dev,
> +                                             struct dma_buf *buf)
> +{
[ ... ]
> +}

More code duplication.

> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_gpu.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_gpu.h
> index 0c85914d9369..9c428ef03060 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_gpu.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_gpu.h

API change should go to a separate patch.

> +/*
> + * VIRTIO_GPU_CMD_RESOURCE_ASSIGN_UUID
> + */
> +#define VIRTIO_GPU_F_CROSS_DEVICE        2

Hmm, how about VIRTIO_GPU_F_RESOURCE_UUID ?

> @@ -87,6 +92,7 @@ enum virtio_gpu_ctrl_type {
>       VIRTIO_GPU_RESP_OK_CAPSET_INFO,
>       VIRTIO_GPU_RESP_OK_CAPSET,
>       VIRTIO_GPU_RESP_OK_EDID,
> +     VIRTIO_GPU_RESP_OK_RESOURCE_ASSIGN_UUID,

The "assign" doesn't make sense in the reply.  I'd name that
VIRTIO_GPU_RESP_OK_RESOURCE_UUID or just VIRTIO_GPU_RESP_OK_UUID,

> +/* VIRTIO_GPU_RESP_OK_RESOURCE_ASSIGN_UUID */
> +struct virtio_gpu_resp_resource_assign_uuid {
> +     struct virtio_gpu_ctrl_hdr hdr;
> +     __u8 uuid[16];
> +};

Same here.

cheers,
  Gerd


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org

Reply via email to