Hi, > > > Can you provide more detail about the envisioned scope of this > > > framework? > > > > The scope is "generic message+FD passing" interface, which is pretty > > much what virtio-wl provides. > > I think that scope is too broad. A socket is a 'generic message+FD' > interface. Unless there's the expectation that the interface should > eventually be as flexible as a regular domain socket, I think it would > be a good idea to frame the scope of the interface more precisely.
Yes, sure, we need to exactly specify the different kinds of file handles / resources. I think it makes sense to have a virtio feature flag for each of them, so guest+host can easily negotiate what they are able to handle and what not. cheers, Gerd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
