On Wed, Jul 07 2021, Jason Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
> This patch is a follow up for the virtqueue state synchronization
> series to implement VIRTIO_F_RING_STATE via a dedicated capability for
> PCI transport.
>
> With the help of the STOP status bit, the virtqueue state
> synchronization for PCI should be self contained.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <[email protected]>
> ---
> content.tex | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
(...)
> +\devicenormative{\paragraph}{General Virtqueue State}{Virtio Transport
> Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / General Virtqueue State}
> +
> +The device MUST present at least one VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_RING_STATE
> capability if VITIO_F_RING_STATE is negotiated.
s/VITIO/VIRTIO/
Are multiple capabilities inteded to enable parallel access to multiple
virtqueues?
> +
> \subsubsection{Legacy Interfaces: A Note on PCI Device
> Layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device
> Layout / Legacy Interfaces: A Note on PCI Device Layout}
>
> Transitional devices MUST present part of configuration
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
