On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 07:30:34AM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: > An unrelated command to AQ in Jason's proposal [1] is about " The management > driver MUST create a managed device by allocating". > We see that creator of the subfunction is often not the only entity managing > it. > They being same in new era finding less and less users. > So this piece needs more discussion whenever we address that. > > [1] https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202108/msg00136.html
This reminds me. How do AQ commands interact with VF lifecycle? E.g. can one change number of vectors for an active VF? Need to specify this. Also, I started worrying about compatibility here. Let's say the msix capability in a VF specifies 16 vectors. Can PF specify 32? If yes how will driver program them? Can PF specify 8? If yes how do we make sure driver does not attempt to use 16? And what happens if it does? Again, something to address. -- MST --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
