On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 02:13:42PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > queue_reset removal has far more editorial changes. > > Before I update the v4 to incorporate, please discuss/sync with Michael or > > others what is best course of action from spec timing perspective. > > I am ok either way to draft either by > > (a) removal of queue_reset register and allow queue_disable by replacing > > RING_RESET definition in v4 > > Or > > (b) fixing the polarity as done in v3 > > Ok. > > Thanks
So Jason, what is your take? I am inclined to keep queue reset register and just flip the polarity. Less spec work and semantics are more or less clear. Not helpful for migration - limited to queue resize, watchdog and similar uses - but if we are expanding scope to migration that makes it imo not 1.2 material. -- MST --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
