I snippet rest of mail - wasn't sure whether you were waiting for an answer.
On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 08:45:26PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: > > Again I don't know what to do with this. I feel if it's put up for vote in > > the current > > form it's likely to fail. I propose cutting out as much as possible as a > > first step, so > > we can make progress. Specifically the MSI-X commands are clearly PF > > specific > > so there's no concern about VF memory use at all. We can worry about other > > types of command down the road when it becomes relevant. > > Since feature bits proposes are limited to PF, I agree that current short cut > is fine to place in 64-127 feature bits. > > When/if similar functionality is needed at scale for the VF or SIOV devices, > placing them in 64-127 bits area weight way less for sake of "people > familiarity to feature bits". > Do you agree? I think we can all agree that extensions for scalable IOV will need more work if that is what you are saying. -- MST --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
