在 2023/1/9 下午7:39, Michael S. Tsirkin 写道:
Btw this "are defined below" all over the place is just contributing to making the spec unnecesarily verbose. Simple "are:" will do.
Sure. I'll fix it in the next version. Thanks. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
