On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 10:33:32AM +0200, Alvaro Karsz wrote:
> Splitting this patch as suggested in v1 will be messy,
>
> We have lines affected by multiple changes, for example:
>
> +\item VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_RX_SET: set the \field{usecs} and
> \field{max_packets} parameters for all the receive virtqueues.
>
> Is affected by the consolidation of the structs and by the statement
> that the command should apply to all virtqueues.
>
> Do you think that this is ok to keep it as a single patch that makes
> multiple minor changes?
It is reasonably small so maybe ok.
--
MST
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]