On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 10:33:32AM +0200, Alvaro Karsz wrote:
> Splitting this patch as suggested in v1 will be messy,
> 
> We have lines affected by multiple changes, for example:
> 
> +\item VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_RX_SET: set the \field{usecs} and
> \field{max_packets} parameters for all the receive virtqueues.
> 
> Is affected by the consolidation of the structs and by the statement
> that the command should apply to all virtqueues.
> 
> Do you think that this is ok to keep it as a single patch that makes
> multiple minor changes?

It is reasonably small so maybe ok.

-- 
MST


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to