在 2023/2/18 上午12:24, Parav Pandit 写道:
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On
Behalf Of Heng Qi
[..]
We assume that hash_report_tunnel_types is still present in the next version,
I am little lost.
Hi, Parav.
You are not lost. I'm just answering some of Michael's questions and
making assumptions. :)
I thought we all agreed that reporting just the tunnel type in data path path
virtio_net_hdr is not useful to sw.
And hence we should omit in the virtio_net_hdr.
Did I miss the motivation to add it back?
If not, probably it is better to review and discuss v9 without it, which will
be easier to discuss.
but it only exists in virtio net hdr and should be populated by the device after
the hash calculation. hash_tunnel_types already controls whether the device
computes internal header hashes.
I don't really follow this, hash_report_tunnel_type is better off
keeping it "report" literally.
Talking about VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_TUNNEL here. Not
hash_report_tunnel_type.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
