> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 6, 2023 5:57 PM
>
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 11:36:18AM +0000, David Edmondson wrote:
> > > + for an enabled transmit/receive
> > > virtqueue whose
> number is \field{vqn}.
> >
> > Should this now be "whose index is \field{vqn}"?
>
> Ugh. I guess we'll have to fix the number/index mess in the spec first. Parav
> you said you are looking into it?
Yes, I want to send v1 for " Rename queue index to queue number" series.
V1 will include,
a. the vqn changes for net device rss and
b. other ccw changes that Cornelia requested.
c. extra note that you asked to add to mmio for referring the old naming
convention
I guess we agree that it should be vqn.
Therefore, vq coalescing and aq series should progress with vqn terminology.
This way all 3 series can progress in parallel (aq, vq coalescing, current spec
cleanup).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
