Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 10:25:32PM CET, pa...@nvidia.com wrote: > >> From: virtio-comm...@lists.oasis-open.org <virtio-comment@lists.oasis- >> open.org> On Behalf Of David Edmondson > >> In support of live migration, might we end up moving large amounts of device >> state through the admin queue? >> >Correct. > >> If so, that would seem to have some performance requirements, though I don't >> know if it would justify multiple admin queues. >DMA of the data through the proposed AQ is supported. > >If I understood Max correctly when Max said " This AQ is not aimed for >performance ", >he means that AQ doesn't have performance requirements as io/network queues to >complete millions of ops/sec. > >it is several hundred to maybe (on the higher side) thousand ops/sec during >LM, provisioning use case.
But isn't it good to design it for performance from start? I mean, state transfer of thousands of VFs at a time is definitelly performance related, isn't it? > >DMA perspective as you mentioned, AQ still has the same perf requirements as >that of regular nw/blk io queues. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
