> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2023 3:15 AM


> It's not conformant to that statement then :( It's a SHOULD which means if you
> know exactly what you are doing, there could be exceptions.
> In this case it's a SHOULD because it was added after 1.0 and we did not find 
> a
> way to negotiate this requirement since it's the feature negotiation itself.

True. May be in future such device can update the revision id.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to