> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> > Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2023 3:14 PM > > On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 04:31:50PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote: > > Now we have the concept of the device group. This allows us to support > > sr-iov and siov more conveniently. > > > > The following description uses pf, vf as an example. The scene with sf > > should be similar. > > > > According to my understanding, the management at the level of > > virtqueue should be handled by admin queue. And the net related > > management is still managed by cvq of pf. So this patch works with the cvq > > of > the pf. > > > > The problem I am trying to solve is when there are multiple vf > > virtio-net devices under one pf. > > It is necessary for administrators to query the status and information > > of each vf and configure mac. > > > > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanz...@linux.alibaba.com> > > > I think we should use admin queue for this, and not cvq. > +1
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org