> From: Zhu, Lingshan <lingshan....@intel.com> > Sent: Monday, September 18, 2023 12:09 PM
> > There is parent object. > > There is VQ which you propose to do SUSPEND_RESET of the parent virtio > device which is already SUSPENDED. > that is why we plan to implement a new feature bit to control this behavior. > It does not matter adding a feature bit when the semantics itself is wrong. > However, in next version, as MST suggested, I will forbid resetting vqs after > SUSPEND. Ok. That is good. I got confused with above proposed bit.
