On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 01:16:42PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:

[..]
> > @@ -719,6 +723,7 @@ void fuse_conn_put(struct fuse_conn *fc)
> >     if (refcount_dec_and_test(&fc->count)) {
> >             struct fuse_iqueue *fiq = &fc->iq;
> >  
> > +           flush_delayed_work(&fc->dax_free_work);
> 
> Today while debugging another case, I realized that flushing work here
> at the very last fuse_conn_put() is a bit too late, here's my analysis,
> 
>          umount                                                   kthread
> 
> deactivate_locked_super
>   ->virtio_kill_sb                                            
> try_to_free_dmap_chunks
>     ->generic_shutdown_super                                    ->igrab()
>                                                                 ...
>      ->evict_inodes()  -> check all inodes' count
>      ->fuse_conn_put                                            ->iput
>  ->virtio_fs_free_devs
>    ->fuse_dev_free
>      ->fuse_conn_put // vq1
>    ->fuse_dev_free
>      ->fuse_conn_put // vq2
>        ->flush_delayed_work
> 
> The above can end up with a warning message reported by evict_inodes()
> about stable inodes.

Hi Liu Bo,

Which warning is that? Can you point me to it in code.

> So I think it's necessary to put either
> cancel_delayed_work_sync() or flush_delayed_work() before going to
> generic_shutdown_super().

In general I agree that shutting down memory range freeing worker
earling in unmount/shutdown sequence makes sense. It does not seem
to help to let it run while filesystem is going away. How about following
patch.

---
 fs/fuse/inode.c     |    1 -
 fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c |    5 +++++
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: redhat-linux/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
===================================================================
--- redhat-linux.orig/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c       2020-03-10 14:11:10.970284651 
-0400
+++ redhat-linux/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c    2020-03-11 08:27:08.103330039 -0400
@@ -1295,6 +1295,11 @@ static void virtio_kill_sb(struct super_
        vfs = fc->iq.priv;
        fsvq = &vfs->vqs[VQ_HIPRIO];
 
+       /* Stop dax worker. Soon evict_inodes() will be called which will
+        * free all memory ranges belonging to all inodes.
+        */
+       flush_delayed_work(&fc->dax_free_work);
+
        /* Stop forget queue. Soon destroy will be sent */
        spin_lock(&fsvq->lock);
        fsvq->connected = false;
Index: redhat-linux/fs/fuse/inode.c
===================================================================
--- redhat-linux.orig/fs/fuse/inode.c   2020-03-10 09:13:35.132565666 -0400
+++ redhat-linux/fs/fuse/inode.c        2020-03-11 08:22:02.685330039 -0400
@@ -723,7 +723,6 @@ void fuse_conn_put(struct fuse_conn *fc)
        if (refcount_dec_and_test(&fc->count)) {
                struct fuse_iqueue *fiq = &fc->iq;
 
-               flush_delayed_work(&fc->dax_free_work);
                if (fc->dax_dev)
                        fuse_free_dax_mem_ranges(&fc->free_ranges);
                if (fiq->ops->release)

_______________________________________________
Virtio-fs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virtio-fs

Reply via email to