* Vivek Goyal ([email protected]) wrote:
> Dan reported a smatch warning during potentential loss of info during
> left shift if this code is compiled on 32bit systems.
> 
> New smatch warnings:
> fs/fuse/dax.c:113 fuse_setup_one_mapping() warn: should 'start_idx << 21' be a
> +64 bit type?
> 
> I ran smatch and found two more instances of similar warning. This patch
> fixes all such instances.
> 
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/fuse/dax.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/dax.c b/fs/fuse/dax.c
> index ff99ab2a3c43..f06fdad3f7b1 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/dax.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/dax.c
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static int fuse_setup_one_mapping(struct inode *inode, 
> unsigned long start_idx,
>       struct fuse_conn_dax *fcd = fm->fc->dax;
>       struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
>       struct fuse_setupmapping_in inarg;
> -     loff_t offset = start_idx << FUSE_DAX_SHIFT;
> +     loff_t offset = (loff_t)start_idx << FUSE_DAX_SHIFT;

I've not followed the others back, but isn't it easier to change
the start_idx parameter to be a loff_t, since the places it's called
from are poth loff_t pos?

Dave

>       FUSE_ARGS(args);
>       ssize_t err;
>  
> @@ -872,7 +872,7 @@ static int dmap_writeback_invalidate(struct inode *inode,
>                                    struct fuse_dax_mapping *dmap)
>  {
>       int ret;
> -     loff_t start_pos = dmap->itn.start << FUSE_DAX_SHIFT;
> +     loff_t start_pos = (loff_t)dmap->itn.start << FUSE_DAX_SHIFT;
>       loff_t end_pos = (start_pos + FUSE_DAX_SZ - 1);
>  
>       ret = filemap_fdatawrite_range(inode->i_mapping, start_pos, end_pos);
> @@ -966,7 +966,7 @@ inode_inline_reclaim_one_dmap(struct fuse_conn_dax *fcd, 
> struct inode *inode,
>       dmap = inode_lookup_first_dmap(inode);
>       if (dmap) {
>               start_idx = dmap->itn.start;
> -             dmap_start = start_idx << FUSE_DAX_SHIFT;
> +             dmap_start = (u64)start_idx << FUSE_DAX_SHIFT;
>               dmap_end = dmap_start + FUSE_DAX_SZ - 1;
>       }
>       up_read(&fi->dax->sem);
> @@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ static int lookup_and_reclaim_dmap(struct fuse_conn_dax 
> *fcd,
>  {
>       int ret;
>       struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
> -     loff_t dmap_start = start_idx << FUSE_DAX_SHIFT;
> +     loff_t dmap_start = (loff_t)start_idx << FUSE_DAX_SHIFT;
>       loff_t dmap_end = (dmap_start + FUSE_DAX_SZ) - 1;
>  
>       down_write(&fi->i_mmap_sem);
> -- 
> 2.25.4
> 
-- 
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / [email protected] / Manchester, UK

_______________________________________________
Virtio-fs mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virtio-fs

Reply via email to