On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:10 PM, DRC <dcomman...@users.sourceforge.net>wrote:
>
> -- I would like to somehow maintain the ability to install our official
> version of VirtualGL on these platforms without causing problems. I
> think we should open a dialog regarding that, such as what happens when
> a user has our version installed and they do a 'yum update'. Maybe the
> official binaries need to change names, maybe we need to consider
> installing all of our stuff under /opt/VirtualGL and using alternatives
> to maintain the /usr/bin symlinks, or maybe we just adopt the same
> packaging standards as Fedora and assume that one package replaces the
> other. Suggestions welcome.
>
> Hey DRC,
I'm going to look at everything carefully tomorrow but I want to re-assure
you we will work to try to make this happen in the right way if its a
concern of yours. (I honestly didn't think about a collision like that,
doh. sorry.) What I'm going to do since I'm new is email my project sponsor
and ask his advice and also see if this is something to ask about on the
fedora-devel mailing list.
Thanks,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
VirtualGL-Devel mailing list
VirtualGL-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtualgl-devel
