Thanks for your answer. I've another dummy question: does running turbo VNC requires a decent graphic card on the server side? or is all the rendering/compression handled by the cpu?
I looked for a "requirements" page / tab on the website but couldn't find it… On Wednesday, 13 September 2017 19:32:08 UTC+2, DRC wrote: > > On a LAN, TurboVNC can pretty easily deliver at least 60-70 > megapixels/second, so that would amount to 4k images at 15+ Hz. We have > thousands of users who are using it for their day-to-day workstation > work with 4k remote desktops over gigabit Ethernet. > > On 9/13/17 11:14 AM, Thomas Julou wrote: > > I should probably mention that I would be happy with playing 200x500px > > image stacks at 10 frames/sec and ecstatic with 2000x2000 at 30 frames > > per sec… > > > > > > On Wednesday, 13 September 2017 18:10:19 UTC+2, Thomas Julou wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I'm looking for a way to have a remote desktop with reasonably > > fast/smooth rendering of image series in ImageJ/Fiji. Our use case > > typically consists in loading a stack of tiff images in the software > > (i.e. in RAM) and playing them at various speed. > > > > Currently we have an x2go connection with is very slow for this. I > > would like to know whether virtualGL is suitable in this case. > > Thank you very much for your help. Best, > > > > Thomas Julou > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "VirtualGL User Discussion/Support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/virtualgl-users/322444ff-9ba8-4907-a653-51f6a7d003e8%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
