Cool.  Glad to hear it works on RHEL 5.  I'll investigate the failures I
was seeing on RHEL 4.  The only caveat is that when using the TurboVNC
client with the TigerVNC server, the JPEG quality settings will not work
the way you expect.  Instead, they map as follows:

Setting quality to 90-100 on client = JPEG quality 100, no subsampling
Setting quality to 80-89 on client = JPEG quality 92, no subsampling
Setting quality to 70-79 on client = JPEG quality 86, no subsampling
Setting quality to 60-69 on client = JPEG quality 79, no subsampling
Setting quality to 50-59 on client = JPEG quality 77, 2x subsampling
Setting quality to 40-49 on client = JPEG quality 62, 2x subsampling
Setting quality to 30-39 on client = JPEG quality 42, 2x subsampling
Setting quality to 20-29 on client = JPEG quality 41, 4x subsampling
Setting quality to 10-19 on client = JPEG quality 29, 4x subsampling
Setting quality to 0-9 on client = JPEG quality 15, 4x subsampling

Thus, you can get the approximate equivalent of "high quality JPEG" by
setting the quality to 80, the approximate equivalent of "medium quality
JPEG" by setting the quality to 60, and "low quality JPEG" by setting
the quality to 20.  The "lossless" modes may or may not work at all, as
they require a TurboVNC-specific extension.

James Pearson wrote:
> Thanks - the application in question appears to work fine with TigerVNC 
> v0.0.91 and VirtualGL - this is on CentOS 5


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
VirtualGL-Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtualgl-users

Reply via email to