On Wednesday 04 April 2007 17:45:44 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > > Why is there a difference for null syscall? I had assumed we patched all > > the > > fast path cases relevant there. Do you have an idea where it comes from? > > Sure. There's indirect calls for things like sti/cli/iret. It goes > back to native speed when you patch the real instructions inline.
I was talking about the patched case. It seemed to be a little slower too, but in theory it shouldn't have been, no? -Andi _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
