Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Sure.
>
> Peter do we want to use the bootloader byte and assign lguest it's own
> bootloader type or do we want to add another field specific to
> paravirtualized environments?
>
The bootloader byte is already a bit too overused; I'm a little scared
that we're going to run out of boot loader IDs as it is.
We probably should add another field, and while we're at it maybe we
should add a boot loader extension field.
-hpa
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
