Avi Kivity wrote:
> Glauber Costa wrote:
>>>
>>> [Once a patchset has been applied and pushed (as seen on
>>> kvm-commits), I prefer incremental patches]
>>>
>> But I think this is a very good case of an exception, since the
>> applied patches would break bisect. I prefer to hear "damn glommer!"
>> because of that than "damn glommer!!" because of a broken bisect.
>
> I fold them up before sending to Linus anyway, so upstream bisect
> continues to work. For kvm.git, it's a choice between rewinding it a
> bit (which may confuse anyone who pulls) and breaking bisect.
>
>
ok, this wfm. I'll send incrementally next time.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
