> > +config PCI_ARI > > + bool "PCI ARI support" > > + depends on PCI > > + default n > > + help > > + This enables PCI Alternative Routing-ID Interpretation. > > This Kconfig help text is a little weak. Why not include the text > you've already written here: > > Support Alternative Routing-ID Interpretation (ARI), which > increases the number of functions that can be supported by a PCIe > endpoint. ARI is required by SR-IOV.
I agree with this improvement to the help text. But a further question is whether ARI even merits its own user-visible config option. Is it worth having yet another choice for users? When would someone want ARI but not SR-IOV? - R. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
