On 06/15/2009 06:20 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>> I would prefer explicit names (pci_addr, lun, etc.) but would be okay
>> with generic names too.
>
> I think having a generic address has a lot of value in terms of code
> implementation. Otherwise, the valid options for -drive become
> context-sensitive which is going to be annoying and error-prone. Some
> sanity could be added by using addressing prefixes like
> addr=pci:00:01.0 or addr=scsi:0.3 but I'll leave that up to whoever
> takes this on.
The code problems are easily solved by adding another level of
indirection. User confusion problems are only aggravated by additional
abstraction, though ("what do I put in addr=, here?").
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
