On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 09:40:40PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Also, see other fixes to the lguest launcher since then which might
> be relevant to this code:
>       lguest: get more serious about wmb() in example Launcher code

Heh, this just gets one step closer to a real wmb.  I just used the
correct code from linux, so I think nothing needs to be done in vhost.
Apropos this change in lguest: why is a compiler barrier sufficient? The
comment says devices are run in separate threads (presumably from
guest?), if so don't you need to tell CPU that there's a barrier as
well?

>       lguest: clean up length-used value in example launcher

OK, fixing that.

Thanks!

-- 
MST
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to