On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 05:20:32 pm Amit Shah wrote:
> @@ -196,7 +216,9 @@ static void virtcons_apply_config(struct virtio_device
> *dev)
> dev->config->get(dev,
> offsetof(struct virtio_console_config, rows),
> &ws.ws_row, sizeof(u16));
> - hvc_resize(port->hvc, ws);
> + /* This is the pre-multiport style: we use control messages
> + * these days which specify the port. So this means port 0. */
> + hvc_resize(find_port_by_vtermno(0)->hvc, ws);
> }
We end up doing this in a couple of places; perhaps we should have something
like:
/*
* Before multiple console support, we always had a single console.
* Code paths without those features can use this.
*/
static struct port *old_style_unique_console(void)
{
return find_port_by_vtermno(0);
}
> err = -ENOMEM;
> - port = add_port(pdrvdata.next_vtermno);
> + port = kzalloc(sizeof *port, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!port)
> goto fail;
I still dislike kzalloc. I think I've said this before :)
Thanks,
Rusty.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
