On (Mon) Jan 04 2010 [15:17:17], Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Mon) Jan 04 2010 [19:45:30], Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 01:04:28 am Amit Shah wrote:
> > > The console could be flooded with data from the host; handle this
> > > situation by buffering the data.
> >
> > Is this still true? If we only add_buf when we're ready, surely the host
> > can't flood us with one virtqueue per port?
>
> I guess I meant something completely different. This message is
> definitely misleading and I'll re-word it.
>
> You're right; we don't need the 'guest throttling' feature that was
> needed earlier.
BTW I meant this series doesn't have the guest throttling feature.
Rusty, did you just have this comment for the series? If yes, I'll just
re-send this patch with a fixed description.
Amit
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
