On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 07:53:43PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 06:03:16 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:13:49PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > - return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
> > > + kfree_skb(skb);
> > > + return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> >
> > If we do so, let's increment the dropped counter and/or error counter?
>
> Yep, here's the extra change:
Looks good to me.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -571,14 +571,16 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_
> /* This can happen with OOM and indirect buffers. */
> if (unlikely(capacity < 0)) {
> if (net_ratelimit()) {
> - if (likely(capacity == -ENOMEM))
> + if (likely(capacity == -ENOMEM)) {
> dev_warn(&dev->dev,
> "TX queue failure: out of memory\n");
> - else
> + } else {
> + dev->stats.tx_fifo_errors++;
> dev_warn(&dev->dev,
> "Unexpected TX queue failure: %d\n",
> capacity);
> }
> + dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
> kfree_skb(skb);
> return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> }
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
