On (Mon) 04 Apr 2011 [16:04:40], Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:57:06 +0530, Amit Shah <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On (Thu) 17 Mar 2011 [17:56:59], Amit Shah wrote:
> > > On (Thu) 17 Mar 2011 [15:26:28], Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:12:10 +0530, Amit Shah <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > When detaching a buffer from a vq, the avail.idx value should be
> > > > > decremented as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > This was noticed by hot-unplugging a virtio console port and then
> > > > > plugging in a new one on the same number (re-using the vqs which were
> > > > > just 'disowned'). qemu reported
> > > > >
> > > > > 'Guest moved used index from 0 to 256'
> > > > >
> > > > > when any IO was attempted on the new port.
> > > >
> > > > Yech... detach_unused_buf cannot be used on a live virtqueue; it assumes
> > > > we will reset the vq (usually by resetting the entire device).
> > > >
> > > > You've partially violated that assumption by reusing the vq after
> > > > calling detach_unused_buf. So I'm not entirely sure this is the only
> > > > bug lurking; safer would be to re-initialize the vq somehow when you
> > > > plug back in...
> > >
> > > Right; and then that will need host changes too (re-init the vqs on
> > > the host side), which then gets us into compat problems...
> >
> > Rusty, any thoughts on this?
>
> Yes... I've applied your patch for the moment, and will send to Linus
> with cc' stable.
OK, thanks!
Amit
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
