> -----Original Message----- > From: Greg KH [mailto:g...@kroah.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 4:31 PM > To: Peter Foley > Cc: KY Srinivasan; gre...@suse.de; Linux Kernel Mailing List; > de...@linuxdriverproject.org; virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org > Subject: Re: Hyper-V TODO file > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:11:39PM -0400, Peter Foley wrote: > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > > > Greg, as I have been pestering you for some time now, we are very > interested in > > > exiting staging and we are willing to dedicate the necessary development > > > resources to address whatever issues that may still be pending. So, your > > > help > > > in identifying what needs to be done will be greatly appreciated. To that > > > end, > > > I think it will be useful to update the TODO file to reflect the current > > > state of > > > the drivers. Let us know how we should proceed here. > > > > An issue I've come across in the hyper-v drivers is the forced modular > > build. You might want to see if the "depends on m" is still needed. > > Ah, good point, KY, can you try this out and see if that can be changed? > If not, something is wrong and that needs to get fixed.
Just verified that we can build into the kernel (not as modules) all hyper-V drivers except hv_storvsc. hv_storvsc depends upon functionality that in my build is being built as modules (SCSI etc.) and this is the reason why I could not build hv_storvsc as part of the kernel. Greg, do you want me to submit a patch to Kconfig, getting rid of the module dependency (for hyperv-v drivers). Regards, K. Y _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
