On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 03:46:23PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Sun, 6 Nov 2011 23:38:49 +0200, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 10:24:57PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 09:30 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 04:53:05PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > > > > I guess my assumption is that most options will be in use, > > > > > > not discarded dead-ends. > > > > > > > > > > I don't know about that. 64 bit features would be pretty rare for now > > > > > - > > > > > and I don't think that setting the alignment will be also enabled by > > > > > default. > > The truth is somewhere between. New features tend to be used, and > importantly, they have to be offered. > > Anyway, the *per-device* config part will be contiguous. So we're > talking about pci-specific features. > > So far, the only three things make sense to have in a capability list: > MSI-X, the upper 32 feature bits, and the per-device config. > > Thanks, > Rusty.
You mean the queue # to MSI-X vector mapping? One thing to remember is that it must be in the same type of BAR as the queue selection, since by PCI rules MMIO writes aren't I think ordered with PIO writes (it doesn't matter with KVM but might with another hypervisor). -- MST _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
