From: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 21:23:00 +0000

> On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 18:45 +0000, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
>> Date: Fri,  9 Dec 2011 12:38:58 +0100
>> 
>> > These two together provide complete ordering. Sub-condition (1) is
>> > satisfied by pvops commit 43223efd9bfd.
>> 
>> I don't see this commit in Linus's tree,
> 
> The referenced commit is in
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git#xen/next-2.6.32  
> some people call the "pvops tree" but there's no reason to expect someone 
> outside the Xen world to know that...
> 
> A better reference would have been 6b0b80ca7165 in
> git://xenbits.xen.org/people/ianc/linux-2.6.git#upstream/dom0/backend/netback-history
>  which is the precise branch that was flattened to make f942dc2552b8, which 
> is the upstream commit that added netback, so this change is already in 
> upstream.

I want the commit message fixed so someone seeing the commit ID can
figure out what it actually refers to.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to