On 04/10/2012 10:28 AM, Ren Mingxin wrote:
> The current virtio block's naming algorithm just supports 18278
> (26^3 + 26^2 + 26) disks. If there are mass of virtio blocks,
> there will be disks with the same name.
>
> Based on commit 3e1a7ff8a0a7b948f2684930166954f9e8e776fe, I add
> function "virtblk_name_format()" for virtio block to support mass
> of disks naming.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ren Mingxin <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> index c4a60ba..86516c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> @@ -374,6 +374,31 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk)
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int virtblk_name_format(char *prefix, int index, char *buf, int
> buflen)
> +{
> + const int base = 'z' - 'a' + 1;
> + char *begin = buf + strlen(prefix);
> + char *begin = buf + strlen(prefix);
Duplicate line.
> + char *end = buf + buflen;
> + char *p;
> + int unit;
> +
> + p = end - 1;
> + *p = '\0';
> + unit = base;
Why not use 'base' below? neither unit nor base change.
> + do {
> + if (p == begin)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + *--p = 'a' + (index % unit);
> + index = (index / unit) - 1;
> + } while (index >= 0);
> +
> + memmove(begin, p, end - p);
> + memcpy(buf, prefix, strlen(prefix));
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
>
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
