* Avi Kivity <[email protected]> wrote:
> > PS: Nikunj had experimented that pv-flush tlb +
> > paravirt-spinlock is a win on PLE where only one of them
> > alone could not prove the benefit.
>
> I'd like to see those numbers, then.
>
> Ingo, please hold on the kvm-specific patches, meanwhile.
I'll hold off on the whole thing - frankly, we don't want this
kind of Xen-only complexity. If KVM can make use of PLE then Xen
ought to be able to do it as well.
If both Xen and KVM makes good use of it then that's a different
matter.
Thanks,
Ingo
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
