On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 13:08:19 -0300, Rafael Aquini <[email protected]> wrote: > As 'locking in balloon', may I assume the approach I took for the compaction > case > is OK and aligned to address these concerns of yours? If not, do not hesitate > in > giving me your thoughts, please. I'm respinning a V3 series to address a > couple > of extra nitpicks from the compaction standpoint, and I'd love to be able to > address any extra concern you might have on the balloon side of that work.
It's orthogonal, though looks like they clash textually :( I'll re-spin MST's patch on top of yours, and include both in my tree, otherwise linux-next will have to do the merge. But I'll await your push before pushing to Linus next merge window. Thanks, Rusty. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
