On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:07:07PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > The KVM list is followed by more people than the generic > [email protected] mailing list, and is > already "de facto" the place where virtio patches are posted.
I have no data on the first statement (do you?) and I disagree with the last statement, but have no objection to people adding kvm list as well. > pv-ops still has no other lists than > [email protected]. > However, pv-ops patches will likely touch Xen or KVM files as well and > the respective mailing list will usually be reached as well. > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> So pls please replace the 1st paragraph in the commit log with "virtio changes are likely to affect many KVM users as virtio is the de-facto standard for PV devices under KVM". Otherwise ok. Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 2 ++ > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 14bc707..e265f2e 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -7340,6 +7340,7 @@ F: include/media/videobuf2-* > VIRTIO CONSOLE DRIVER > M: Amit Shah <[email protected]> > L: [email protected] > +L: [email protected] > S: Maintained > F: drivers/char/virtio_console.c > F: include/linux/virtio_console.h > @@ -7348,6 +7349,7 @@ VIRTIO CORE, NET AND BLOCK DRIVERS > M: Rusty Russell <[email protected]> > M: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]> > L: [email protected] > +L: [email protected] > S: Maintained > F: drivers/virtio/ > F: drivers/net/virtio_net.c > -- > 1.7.1 _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
