On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 12:31 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 07:01:05PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 18:05 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
<SNIP> > > > I was talking about 4/6 first of all. > > > > So yeah, this code is still considered RFC at this point for-3.6, but > > I'd like to get this into target-pending/for-next in next week for more > > feedback and start collecting signoffs for the necessary pieces that > > effect existing vhost code. > > > > By that time the cmwq conversion of tcm_vhost should be in place as > > well.. > > I'll try to give some feedback but I think we do need > to see the qemu patches - they weren't posted yet, were they? > This driver has some userspace interface and once > that is merged it has to be supported. > So I think we need the buy-in from the qemu side at the principal level. > <nod> Stefan posted the QEMU vhost-scsi patches a few items, but I think it's been awhile since the last round of review. For the recent development's with tcm_vhost, I've been using Zhi's QEMU tree here: https://github.com/wuzhy/qemu/tree/vhost-scsi Other than a few printf I added to help me understand how it works, no function changes have been made to work with target-pending/tcm_vhost. Thank you, --nab _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
