Amit Shah <amit.s...@redhat.com> writes:
> On (Mon) 05 Nov 2012 [11:31:24], Amit Shah wrote:
>> On (Mon) 05 Nov 2012 [09:11:45], Rusty Russell wrote:
>> > Sjur Brændeland <s...@brendeland.net> writes:
>> > 
>> > > From: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandel...@stericsson.com>
>> > >
>> > > This patch-set introduces a new virtio type "rproc_serial" for 
>> > > communicating
>> > > with remote processors over shared memory. The driver depends on the
>> > > the remoteproc framework. As preparation for introducing "rproc_serial"
>> > > I've done a refactoring of the transmit buffer handling.
>> > >
>> > > Changes since v7:
>> > > - Rebased to virtio-next branch.
>> > > - Removed extra added lines.
>> > > - Removed superfluous checks before calling reclaim_dma_bufs().
>> > > - Rusty raised some question regarding garbage collection of the
>> > >   out-vq, so I moved this into a separate patch.
>> > 
>> > OK, I'm not sure that WARN_ON won't fire, but that's not all that
>> > harmful.
>> 
>> Sjur said he'll send out a respin for this; can you wait for his v8?
>
> Er, v9.
>
>               Amit

Yep, they're in my pending-rebases tree now.

Though no need to repost the whole series; just the changes please.

Cheers,
Rusty.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to