On 12/05/2012 07:16 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:03:28PM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>> Use dev_to_virtio wrapper in virtio to make code clearly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio.h b/include/linux/virtio.h
>> index 25fa1a6..30fc3c9 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/virtio.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/virtio.h
>> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ struct virtio_device {
>> void *priv;
>> };
>>
>> -#define dev_to_virtio(dev) container_of(dev, struct virtio_device, dev)
>> +#define dev_to_virtio(_dev) container_of(_dev, struct virtio_device, dev)
>> int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev);
>> void unregister_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev);
>
>
> More importantly this would fix dev_to_virtio since ATM
>
> dev_to_virtio(_d) resolves to
> container_of(_d, struct virtio_device, _d)
>
> which is not what was intended.
Yes, you are right, I not mentioned.
>
> However, I think this shows that using a macro here
> is a mistake. Could you code this up with a static inline
> function instead please?
Sure.
Thanks,
Wanlong Gao
>
>>
>> --
>> 1.8.0
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
