On (Mon) 11 Feb 2013 [14:12:52], Sjur Brændeland wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Amit Shah <amit.s...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On (Thu) 17 Jan 2013 [13:23:17], sjur.brandel...@stericsson.com wrote:
> > > From: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandel...@stericsson.com>
> > >
> > > Use virtio device index for creating unique device port names.
> > > Current index allocation in virtio is based on a monotonically
> > > increasing variable "index". A better handling of this is to
> > > use device index which is allocated by ida.
> >
> > This should be fine. I'm wondering, though, if there's something else
> > you need from the naming scheme (esp. considering the next patch)?
>
> This current patch solves the most critical issue - that the device name
> changes for every modem reboot. This is a show-stopper for me. So it would
> be
> great if this patch could go upstream. The other problem that device name
> is non-deterministic is currently only a theoretical problem as we have
> only one
> remoteproc device.
OK - I've no problem with the patch.
Amit
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
