On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 03:50:33PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Rusty Russell <[email protected]> writes:
> > Add virtqueue_add_sgs which is more general than virtqueue_add_buf,
> > which makes virtio-scsi and virtio-blk nicer, then add virtqueue_add_inbuf
> > and virtqueue_add_outbuf which handle the more general case, and finally
> > delete virtqueue_add_buf().
> >
> > I'm hoping this will be the final post of the whole series, and it can
> > move from my pending-rebases tree into virtio-next.
> 
> OK, thanks for the feedback, reviews and corrections everyone.
> 
> I folded the following patches into one commit:
> 
>  Subject: [PATCH 02/22] virtio_ring: virtqueue_add_sgs, to add multiple sgs.
>  Subject: [PATCH 03/22] virtio_ring: don't count elements twice for add_buf 
> path.
>  Subject: [PATCH 04/22] virtio_ring: inline internal vring functions more 
> aggres
> 
> I've put it into virtio-next, so please send any further fixes as diffs
> against that.

Cheers!

-- 
Asias
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to