On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 05:11:37PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 02:55:27PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
> > This patch makes vhost_scsi_flush() wait for all the pending requests
> > issued before the flush operation to be finished.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Asias He <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c | 117
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.h | 4 ++
> > 2 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c
> > index e734ead..dc0af52 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c
> > @@ -82,6 +82,15 @@ struct vhost_scsi {
> >
> > bool vs_events_dropped; /* any missed events, protected by dev.mutex */
> > u64 vs_events_nr; /* num of pending events, protected by dev.mutex */
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * vs_inflight[0]/[1] are used to track requests issued
> > + * before/during the flush operation
> > + */
> > + u64 vs_inflight[2];
> > + wait_queue_head_t vs_flush_wait; /* wait queue for flush operation */
> > + spinlock_t vs_flush_lock; /* lock to protect vs_during_flush */
> > + int vs_during_flush; /* flag to indicate if we are in flush operation */
>
> So this adds a spinlock on data path and I'm not sure
> I understand why this is correct (see also comment below).
vs_flush_lock is accessed in:
1) tcm_vhost_allocate_evt() and tcm_vhost_free_evt()
2) vhost_scsi_allocate_cmd() and vhost_scsi_free_cmd().
The former is not on data path. The later is always executed in the
vhost thread. So we can almost always take the lock with no contention.
And I am not seeing any real perf differences.
> And generally we should try to avoid reimplementing refcounting. How
> about we use a kref pointer instead? Access can use RCU (or maybe put
> it in vq->private and use the tricky vhost version of RCU). Initialize
> it to 1. To flush you replace the pointer, decrement then wait for
> refcount to reach 0.
This makes the code even more tricky and hard to understand. I am not
sure this is a place where kref is the right choice.
> This still adds atomics on data path so maybe worth benchmarking to
> verify performance overhead is not measureable, but at least it's
> one atomic and not a full lock.
> Hmm?
>
>
> > };
> >
> > /* Local pointer to allocated TCM configfs fabric module */
> > @@ -99,6 +108,46 @@ static int iov_num_pages(struct iovec *iov)
> > ((unsigned long)iov->iov_base & PAGE_MASK)) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > }
> >
> > +static int tcm_vhost_inc_inflight(struct vhost_scsi *vs)
> > +{
> > + int during_flush;
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&vs->vs_flush_lock);
> > + during_flush = vs->vs_during_flush;
> > + vs->vs_inflight[during_flush]++;
> > + spin_unlock(&vs->vs_flush_lock);
> > +
> > + return during_flush;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void tcm_vhost_dec_inflight(struct vhost_scsi *vs, int during_flush)
> > +{
> > + u64 inflight;
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&vs->vs_flush_lock);
> > + inflight = vs->vs_inflight[during_flush]--;
> > + /*
> > + * Wakeup the waiter when all the requests issued before the flush
> > + * operation are finished and we are during the flush operation.
> > + */
> > + if (!inflight && !during_flush && vs->vs_during_flush)
> > + wake_up(&vs->vs_flush_wait);
> > + spin_unlock(&vs->vs_flush_lock);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool tcm_vhost_done_inflight(struct vhost_scsi *vs)
> > +{
> > + bool ret = false;
> > +
> > + /* The requests issued before the flush operation are finished ? */
> > + spin_lock(&vs->vs_flush_lock);
> > + if (!vs->vs_inflight[0])
> > + ret = true;
> > + spin_unlock(&vs->vs_flush_lock);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > static bool tcm_vhost_check_feature(struct vhost_scsi *vs, int feature)
> > {
> > bool ret = false;
> > @@ -391,6 +440,8 @@ static int tcm_vhost_queue_tm_rsp(struct se_cmd *se_cmd)
> >
> > static void tcm_vhost_free_evt(struct vhost_scsi *vs, struct tcm_vhost_evt
> > *evt)
> > {
> > +
> > + tcm_vhost_dec_inflight(vs, evt->during_flush);
> > mutex_lock(&vs->dev.mutex);
> > vs->vs_events_nr--;
> > kfree(evt);
> > @@ -412,6 +463,7 @@ static struct tcm_vhost_evt
> > *tcm_vhost_allocate_evt(struct vhost_scsi *vs,
> > if (evt) {
> > evt->event.event = event;
> > evt->event.reason = reason;
> > + evt->during_flush = tcm_vhost_inc_inflight(vs);
> > vs->vs_events_nr++;
> > }
> > mutex_unlock(&vs->dev.mutex);
> > @@ -422,6 +474,7 @@ static struct tcm_vhost_evt
> > *tcm_vhost_allocate_evt(struct vhost_scsi *vs,
> > static void vhost_scsi_free_cmd(struct tcm_vhost_cmd *tv_cmd)
> > {
> > struct se_cmd *se_cmd = &tv_cmd->tvc_se_cmd;
> > + struct vhost_scsi *vs = tv_cmd->tvc_vhost;
> >
> > /* TODO locking against target/backend threads? */
> > transport_generic_free_cmd(se_cmd, 1);
> > @@ -434,13 +487,16 @@ static void vhost_scsi_free_cmd(struct tcm_vhost_cmd
> > *tv_cmd)
> > kfree(tv_cmd->tvc_sgl);
> > }
> >
> > + tcm_vhost_dec_inflight(vs, tv_cmd->during_flush);
> > +
> > kfree(tv_cmd);
> > }
> >
> > static void tcm_vhost_do_evt_work(struct vhost_scsi *vs,
> > - struct virtio_scsi_event *event)
> > + struct tcm_vhost_evt *evt)
> > {
> > struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &vs->vqs[VHOST_SCSI_VQ_EVT];
> > + struct virtio_scsi_event *event = &evt->event;
> > struct virtio_scsi_event __user *eventp;
> > unsigned out, in;
> > int head, ret;
> > @@ -503,7 +559,7 @@ static void tcm_vhost_evt_work(struct vhost_work *work)
> > while (llnode) {
> > evt = llist_entry(llnode, struct tcm_vhost_evt, list);
> > llnode = llist_next(llnode);
> > - tcm_vhost_do_evt_work(vs, &evt->event);
> > + tcm_vhost_do_evt_work(vs, evt);
> > tcm_vhost_free_evt(vs, evt);
> > }
> > }
> > @@ -521,8 +577,8 @@ static void vhost_scsi_complete_cmd_work(struct
> > vhost_work *work)
> > struct virtio_scsi_cmd_resp v_rsp;
> > struct tcm_vhost_cmd *tv_cmd;
> > struct llist_node *llnode;
> > - struct se_cmd *se_cmd;
> > int ret, vq;
> > + struct se_cmd *se_cmd;
> >
> > bitmap_zero(signal, VHOST_SCSI_MAX_VQ);
> > llnode = llist_del_all(&vs->vs_completion_list);
> > @@ -560,6 +616,7 @@ static void vhost_scsi_complete_cmd_work(struct
> > vhost_work *work)
> > }
> >
> > static struct tcm_vhost_cmd *vhost_scsi_allocate_cmd(
> > + struct vhost_scsi *vs,
> > struct tcm_vhost_tpg *tv_tpg,
> > struct virtio_scsi_cmd_req *v_req,
> > u32 exp_data_len,
> > @@ -584,6 +641,8 @@ static struct tcm_vhost_cmd *vhost_scsi_allocate_cmd(
> > tv_cmd->tvc_exp_data_len = exp_data_len;
> > tv_cmd->tvc_data_direction = data_direction;
> > tv_cmd->tvc_nexus = tv_nexus;
> > + tv_cmd->tvc_vhost = vs;
> > + tv_cmd->during_flush = tcm_vhost_inc_inflight(vs);
> >
> > return tv_cmd;
> > }
> > @@ -824,7 +883,7 @@ static void vhost_scsi_handle_vq(struct vhost_scsi *vs,
> > for (i = 0; i < data_num; i++)
> > exp_data_len += vq->iov[data_first + i].iov_len;
> >
> > - tv_cmd = vhost_scsi_allocate_cmd(tv_tpg, &v_req,
> > + tv_cmd = vhost_scsi_allocate_cmd(vs, tv_tpg, &v_req,
> > exp_data_len, data_direction);
> > if (IS_ERR(tv_cmd)) {
> > vq_err(vq, "vhost_scsi_allocate_cmd failed %ld\n",
> > @@ -834,7 +893,6 @@ static void vhost_scsi_handle_vq(struct vhost_scsi *vs,
> > pr_debug("Allocated tv_cmd: %p exp_data_len: %d, data_direction"
> > ": %d\n", tv_cmd, exp_data_len, data_direction);
> >
> > - tv_cmd->tvc_vhost = vs;
> > tv_cmd->tvc_vq = vq;
> >
> > if (unlikely(vq->iov[out].iov_len !=
> > @@ -887,6 +945,7 @@ static void vhost_scsi_handle_vq(struct vhost_scsi *vs,
> > * tcm_vhost_queue_data_in() and tcm_vhost_queue_status()
> > */
> > tv_cmd->tvc_vq_desc = head;
> > +
> > /*
> > * Dispatch tv_cmd descriptor for cmwq execution in process
> > * context provided by tcm_vhost_workqueue. This also ensures
> > @@ -956,6 +1015,34 @@ static void vhost_scsi_handle_kick(struct vhost_work
> > *work)
> > vhost_scsi_handle_vq(vs, vq);
> > }
> >
> > +static void vhost_scsi_flush_vq(struct vhost_scsi *vs, int index)
> > +{
> > + vhost_poll_flush(&vs->dev.vqs[index].poll);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void vhost_scsi_flush(struct vhost_scsi *vs)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + /* Flush operation is started */
> > + spin_lock(&vs->vs_flush_lock);
> > + vs->vs_during_flush = 1;
> > + spin_unlock(&vs->vs_flush_lock);
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < VHOST_SCSI_MAX_VQ; i++)
> > + vhost_scsi_flush_vq(vs, i);
> > + vhost_work_flush(&vs->dev, &vs->vs_completion_work);
> > + vhost_work_flush(&vs->dev, &vs->vs_event_work);
> > +
> > + /* Wait until all requests issued before the flush to be finished */
> > + wait_event(vs->vs_flush_wait, tcm_vhost_done_inflight(vs));
> > +
> > + /* Flush operation is finished */
> > + spin_lock(&vs->vs_flush_lock);
> > + vs->vs_during_flush = 0;
> > + spin_unlock(&vs->vs_flush_lock);
> > +}
> > +
>
> Weird.
> What about requests issued during flush operation?
> When next flush starts shouldn't we flush them?
>
> > /*
> > * Called from vhost_scsi_ioctl() context to walk the list of available
> > * tcm_vhost_tpg with an active struct tcm_vhost_nexus
> > @@ -1042,6 +1129,7 @@ static int vhost_scsi_clear_endpoint(
> > u8 target;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&vs->dev.mutex);
> > +
> > /* Verify that ring has been setup correctly. */
> > for (index = 0; index < vs->dev.nvqs; ++index) {
> > if (!vhost_vq_access_ok(&vs->vqs[index])) {
> > @@ -1109,6 +1197,10 @@ static int vhost_scsi_open(struct inode *inode,
> > struct file *f)
> > vhost_work_init(&s->vs_event_work, tcm_vhost_evt_work);
> >
> > s->vs_events_nr = 0;
> > + s->vs_inflight[0] = 0;
> > + s->vs_inflight[1] = 0;
> > + spin_lock_init(&s->vs_flush_lock);
> > + init_waitqueue_head(&s->vs_flush_wait);
> >
> > s->vqs[VHOST_SCSI_VQ_CTL].handle_kick = vhost_scsi_ctl_handle_kick;
> > s->vqs[VHOST_SCSI_VQ_EVT].handle_kick = vhost_scsi_evt_handle_kick;
> > @@ -1139,21 +1231,6 @@ static int vhost_scsi_release(struct inode *inode,
> > struct file *f)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static void vhost_scsi_flush_vq(struct vhost_scsi *vs, int index)
> > -{
> > - vhost_poll_flush(&vs->dev.vqs[index].poll);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void vhost_scsi_flush(struct vhost_scsi *vs)
> > -{
> > - int i;
> > -
> > - for (i = 0; i < VHOST_SCSI_MAX_VQ; i++)
> > - vhost_scsi_flush_vq(vs, i);
> > - vhost_work_flush(&vs->dev, &vs->vs_completion_work);
> > - vhost_work_flush(&vs->dev, &vs->vs_event_work);
> > -}
> > -
> > static int vhost_scsi_set_features(struct vhost_scsi *vs, u64 features)
> > {
> > if (features & ~VHOST_SCSI_FEATURES)
> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.h
> > index 94e9ee53..dd84622 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.h
> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.h
> > @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ struct tcm_vhost_cmd {
> > unsigned char tvc_sense_buf[TRANSPORT_SENSE_BUFFER];
> > /* Completed commands list, serviced from vhost worker thread */
> > struct llist_node tvc_completion_list;
> > + /* Indicate this command is issued during the flush operaton */
> > + int during_flush;
> > };
> >
> > struct tcm_vhost_nexus {
> > @@ -91,6 +93,8 @@ struct tcm_vhost_evt {
> > struct virtio_scsi_event event;
> > /* virtio_scsi event list, serviced from vhost worker thread */
> > struct llist_node list;
> > + /* Indicate this event is issued during the flush operaton */
> > + int during_flush;
> > };
> >
> > /*
> > --
> > 1.8.1.4
--
Asias
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
