Hi Sebastian,
Thanks for your review.
The patch applies to the mainstream kernel, so seems there's difference
between tip and the mainstream kernel. I will try to find the
difference.
And there's another patch for Xen, but I found the mail tile is
wrong:( Please refer to:
http://www.kernelhub.org/?msg=373208&p=2
Should I merge the patch for xen with the patch for native x86?
Is there any dependency between them?
Thanks!
Gerry
On 12/12/2013 06:10 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 05.12.13, Jiang Liu wrote:
>
> I like this in general however
>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
>> index 7cf1689..f241792 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
>> @@ -560,7 +560,6 @@ static inline int xen_map_vector(int vector)
>> xen_vector = XEN_RESCHEDULE_VECTOR;
>> break;
>> case CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR:
>> - case CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_VECTOR:
>> xen_vector = XEN_CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR;
>> break;
>> case IRQ_WORK_VECTOR:
>
> This chunk does not apply again tip's master branch, the code looks
> different. You need to also kill XEN_CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_VECTOR which
> is either part of a different patch or against a different tree. I
> haven't seen a note in 0/19 or this patch description so I'm confused
> here :)
>
> Sebastian
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
