Venkatesh Srinivas <[email protected]> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Venkatesh Srinivas
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> And I rewrote it substantially, mainly to take
>>> VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC into account.
>>>
>>> As QEMU sets the vq size for PCI to 128, Venkatash's patch wouldn't
>>> have made a change.  This version does (since QEMU also offers
>>> VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC.
>>
>> That divide-by-2 produced the same queue depth as the prior
>> computation in QEMU was deliberate -- but raising it to 128 seems
>> pretty reasonable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Srinivas <[email protected]>
>
> Soft ping about this patch.

It's head of my virtio-next tree.

Cheers,
Rusty.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to