On Sun, 2014-11-30 at 18:44 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 11/30/2014 6:11 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> 
> > We need to use bit 32 for virtio 1.0
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 4 ++--
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> > index 3eda654..c624b09 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> > @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ struct vhost_virtqueue {
> >     /* Protected by virtqueue mutex. */
> >     struct vhost_memory *memory;
> >     void *private_data;
> > -   unsigned acked_features;
> > +   u64 acked_features;
> >     /* Log write descriptors */
> >     void __user *log_base;
> >     struct vhost_log *log;
> > @@ -174,6 +174,6 @@ enum {
> >
> >   static inline int vhost_has_feature(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, int bit)
> >   {
> > -   return vq->acked_features & (1 << bit);
> > +   return vq->acked_features & (1ULL << bit);
> 
>     Erm, wouldn't the high word be just dropped when returning *int*? I think 
> you need !!(vq->acked_features & (1ULL << bit)).

Or change the return type to bool.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
The first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to