On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 20:50:35 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 06:27:53PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:53:32 +0200 > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > Two enhancements for virtio_ccw, on top of latest 1.0 patchset > > > > > > Cornelia Huck (1): > > > virtio_ccw: finalize_features error handling > > > > > > Michael S. Tsirkin (1): > > > virtio_ccw: future-proof finalize_features > > > > > > drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c | 18 +++++++++++------- > > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > > > > I tried to run this as a guest kernel with my virtio-1 qemu branch + > > your revision patch on top and it at least boots :) More testing > > tomorrow. > > It's best if you pick my tree from git. > vhost-next branch. > FWIW: Your current vhost-next branch + my qemu with the known bugs seems to hold up well so far; the endianness swap does not seem to cause a noticeable performance hit (the problems come from my qemu code dropping feature bits...) Take this with a grain of salt as current qemu virtio-1 has known problems, but I don't think there are major reasons speaking against inclusion. At least, I don't think there's anything in there we can't easily fix up later. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
