On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 21:11:44 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 05:29:49PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Dec 2014 12:24:46 +0200 > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 02:25:21PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > > Wire up virtio-blk to provide different feature bit sets depending > > > > on whether legacy or v1.0 has been requested. > > > > > > > > Note that VERSION_1 is still disabled due to missing ANY_LAYOUT support. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com> > > > > > > So we need some way for devices to tell transports > > > not to negotiate rev 1. > > > Does clearing VERSION_1 have this effect? > > > > > I just noticed that my patch is running in circles here. > > > > What we need is probably the transport-dependent maximum revision > > checker (which at least for ccw is acting on a device) pass in the > > requested revision and check if the feature bits for the revision > > include VERSION_1. Does that make sense? > > Just make devices set 'rev 1 supported' flag? I'm now using the ->get_features() callback to check for VERSION_1 (assuming every device that supports it adds the bit in its callback) and only allow rev 1 if it is present. Will play with this a bit as well. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
