From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 22:17:17 +1030

> This paraphrases DaveM (and steals some of his words) explaining why
> a device shouldn't return NETDEV_TX_BUSY, even though it looks so inviting
> to driver authors.
> 
> See http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg322350.html
> 
> Inspired-by: David Miller <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>

Applied.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to